dzԹ

Skip to main content

Oil pipeline Keystone XLdzԹs fate debated after ObamadzԹs speech on climate change

 

World dzԹ,

In a recent speech addressing climate change, US President Barack Obama arguably tied the fate of the heavily debated, proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline to its impact on greenhouse gas emissions.

Halfway through his speech at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., Obama singled out the pipeline project, saying a US energy strategy will be encompass many different sectors. dzԹItdzԹs certainly going to be about more than just building one pipeline,dzԹ he said.

TransCanadadzԹs Cdn$ 5.3 billion pipeline project will only get a green light if the US State Department, required to grant approval since the pipeline will cross an international border, thinks the project serves the nationdzԹs interests, the President said to applause, which means it must not significantly dzԹexacerbate the problem of carbon pollution.dzԹ

dzԹThe net effects of the pipelinedzԹs impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward. ItdzԹs relevant,dzԹ he added.

Canadian relations

The long-delayed project carrying oil from AlbertadzԹs oilsands to refineries on the Gulf Coast has seen much opposition, with many environmental groups pressuring the President to veto the project. On the other side, Republicans, and business and labour groups, have urged the Obama administration to approve the pipeline as a source of jobs and a step toward North American energy independence.

Canada has said the project would be a welcome economic boost, and CanadadzԹs Prime Minister Stephen Harper has warned that its rejection could tarnish relations with the US.

Canada has the worlddzԹs third largest oil reserves, with 170 billion bbls of proven reserves in the oilsands region alone. Canada needs infrastructure in place to export its growing production. The country relies on its southern neighbour for 97% of its energy exports.

Long-delayed decision

On 1st March 2013, the US Department of State released a Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) on Keystone XL that reaffirmed dzԹthere would be no significant impacts to most resources along the proposed Project route.dzԹ

The report acknowledged that development of the oilsands in Alberta would create greenhouse gases, but it also made clear that other methods to transport the oil dzԹ including rail, trucks and barges dzԹ also pose a risk to the environment. For instance, a scenario that would move the oil on trains to mostly existing pipelines would release 8% more greenhouse gases than Keystone XL, the report said.

Reactions

In reaction to ObamadzԹs speech, CanadadzԹs Natural Resources Minister said hedzԹs confident the oil pipeline will be approved because it meets President ObamadzԹs requirement that it not lead to a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions.

Minister Joe Oliver pointed to dzԹObamadzԹs very own State DepartmentdzԹ which he said concluded in a report this year dzԹthat there would be no increase in greenhouse gas emissions.dzԹ

dzԹThis pipeline has been the most studied pipeline in the history of the world,dzԹ Oliver added.

Similar to most discussion related to the Keystone XL pipeline, reaction to ObamadzԹs comments was sharply divided. Environmental groups have interpreted the speech as indicative of the pipelinedzԹs impending rejection, where as energy industry representatives, including TransCanada, said they believe the pipeline will meet ObamadzԹs criteria.

Renowned climate activist Bill McKibben said on Twitter, dzԹSo pleased that Barack Obama understands that the KXL fight is about climate.dzԹ Al Gore, on his blog, wrote that dzԹThis was a terrific and historic speech, by far the best address on climate by any president ever.dzԹ

However, the President did not reject the pipeline in his speech, nor promise to do so in the future. Forbes staff writer Christopher Helman has chosen to focus on the word dzԹexacerbatedzԹ, which leaves a lot of wiggle room. dzԹIt means to aggravate, to sharpen, or to make a bad problem worse. The anti-Keystone crowd naturally thinks that the pipeline, or anything that aids in the transport of oilsands crude, would exacerbate carbon emissions.But thatdzԹs not what the State Department found [in its Draft SEIS],dzԹ he notes.

TransCanada, the Calgary-based company that has proposed the pipeline, said in a statement it was pleased with ObamadzԹs comments setting out criteria for pipeline approval.

dzԹThe almost five-year review of the project has already repeatedly found that these criteria are satisfied,dzԹ said Russ Girling, TransCanadadzԹs President and Chief Executive.

Political decision

After considering ObamadzԹs speech, Greg Stringham, the Canadian Association of Petroleum ProducersdzԹ Vice-President of Oilsands and Markets, said he believes it is another step toward the oil pipelinedzԹs ultimate approval when considered in conjunction with the State Department draft environmental review.

dzԹItdzԹs still a political decision so wedzԹre looking for certainty and wedzԹre hoping it will be sooner rather than later,dzԹ Stringham said. dzԹBut as we look at the process through this, as the State Department is working on their final environmental impact assessment, we dondzԹt see anything that would have changed the conclusions they came up with in March.dzԹ

The pipeline would carry 800 000 bpd of oil across six US states to refineries along the Gulf Coast. A southern leg from Oklahoma to ports near Houston already has been approved, and construction is proceeding.

The Obama administration is expected to make a final decision on Keystone by the end of the year.

Edited from various sources by

 

CanadadzԹs pipe dreams

Canada has a wealth of new and existing deposits of oil and gas clamouring for pipeline capacity to market. The challenge, says Gordon Cope, is building it.